Table 2

Subscale “Professor Satisfaction” of the Subject Assessment Questionnaire.

Academic year
2017/20182018/2019 p
value
d
MSDMSD
1. The professor complied with the teaching guide4.440.734.400.72.860.06
2. The professor used the assessment criteria included in the teaching guide4.330.714.330.76.930.00
3. Theory and practice were well coordinated3.891.364.211.01.530.30
4. The selected activities promoted learning 3.221.304.121.10.040.80
5. The professor’s explanations helped me understand the content3.891.174.120.99.590.23
6. The professor demonstrated mastery of the subject4.220.974.670.66.150.64
7. The professor promoted student participation in class4.220.974.320.79.830.12
8. The professor solved doubts and provided guidance4.330.874.320.87.960.01
9. The resources used were adequate for learning4.221.394.240.90.570.02
10. I am satisfied with the support provided by the professor4.000.934.251.04.340.24
11. The professor increased my interest in the subject3.441.674.001.04.430.49
12. Global score of the professor’s performance3.671.224.250.84.170.65
Note. M = Mean; SD = Standard Deviation; p-value = Mann-Whitney U test; d Cohen = Effect size.