Table 6
Differences in attention according to weight status and diet quality.
| Normal-weight/ Optimal DQ M ± SD (n = 69) | Normal-weight/ Improvable DQ M ± SD (n = 42) | Overweight/Optimal DQ M ± SD (n = 48) | Overweight/Improvable DQ M ± SD (n = 50) | F | p | η² | Post hoc1 | ||||||
| 1-2 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 3-4 | ||||||||
| Number of Correct Answers (0-60) | 40.57 ± 6.92 | 35.25 ± 7.84 | 32.00 ± 8.22 | 31.54 ± 7.41 | 1.492 | .220 | .02 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Number of Errors (0-60) | 1.32 ± 0.55 | 1.59 ± 0.12 | 1.37 ± 0.49 | 2.55 ± 0.74 | 2.022 | .115 | .02 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Number of Omissions (0-60) | 20.77 ± 9.90 | 20.12 ± 7.20 | 20.32 ± 9.57 | 17.67 ± 6.97 | 1.814 | .489 | .01 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Inhibitory Control (1-100) | 93.40 ± 12.70 | 90.00 ± 13.77 | 81.16 ± 7.84 | 83.19 ± 9.88 | 2.834 | .041* | .06 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Attentional Efficiency (1-100) | 67.58 ± 17.13 | 67.12 ± 11.55 | 55.33 ± 17.18 | 57.13 ± 13.66 | 1.292 | .281 | .02 | NS | < | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Índice global Overall Attention Index a (1-9) | 6.19 ± 0.96 | 5.71 ± 0.67 | 5.25 ± 0.20 | 5.05 ± 1.07 | 1.124 | .342 | .02 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Note: (*) p <.05. M±SD=mean±standard deviation. aGlobal Attention Index calculated from the enneatypes score. NS:denotes lack of statistical significance. 1Pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction. | |||||||||||||
