Table 4
Relationship between the use of different forms of grading and the specific competencies developed in pre-service training according to whether or not the respondents are working
Is working | Is not working | ||||||
Design, application and assessment of teaching-learning processes in PE | Motor and sport contents | Physical conditioning and health contents | Design, application and assessment of teaching-learning processes in PE | Motor and sport contents | Physical conditioning and health contents | ||
Model 1 | |||||||
Grading | |||||||
Heterograding | 0.059 | 0.167* | 0.035 | 0.037 | 0.015 | 0.037 | |
Self-grading | 0.504** | 0.146 | 0.110 | 0.293** | 0.187** | 0.031 | |
Dialogued grading | 0.431** | 0.128 | 0.055 | 0.256** | 0.140* | 0.055 | |
Co-grading | 0.442** | 0.227* | 0.111 | 0.240** | 0.147* | 0.084 | |
Model 2 (adjusted by teaching experience) | |||||||
Grading | |||||||
Heterograding | 0.059 | 0.168* | 0.036 | 0.035 | 0.014 | 0.035 | |
Self-grading | 0.507** | 0.140 | 0.100 | 0.298** | 0.189* | 0.033 | |
Dialogued grading | 0.432** | 0.124 | 0.048 | 0.260** | 0.141* | 0.056 | |
Co-grading | 0.462** | 0.218* | 0.088 | 0.246** | 0.149* | 0.087 | |
**p < .001; *p <. 05. |