Table 3
Multiple regression analysis to establish predictive models of the marks or performance in PE
| Criterion | Predictors | t | p | β |
| SS | 3.30 | .00 | .19 | |
| PC | 1.30 | .20 | .80 | |
| PE performance (PEP) | PA | –0.42 | .68 | –.03 |
| ST | –0.26 | .80 | –.01 | |
| R2= .15 | GPS | 0,70 | .49 | .05 |
| GS | 0.91 | .36 | .05 | |
| S.E. of the estimate = 1.43 | TO | 0.81 | .42 | .04 |
| EO | 0.56 | .58 | .02 | |
| E | –0.93 | .36 | –.06 | |
| A | –2.07 | .04 | –.12 | |
| S | 2.33 | .02 | .12 | |
| F | 0.33 | .75 | .02 | |
| CMP | 0.71 | .48 | .05 | |
| MPAQ | 1.17 | .24 | .05 | |
| Note. PEP: PE performance; SS:Sports skill; PC: Physical condition; PA: Physical attractiveness; ST: Strength; GPS: General physical self-concept; GS : General self-concept; TO: Task orientation; EO: Ego orientation; E: Enjoyment; A: Appearance; S: Socialisation; F: Fitness; CMP: Competence; MPAQ: Index of extracurricular physical activity. | ||||
