Table 2

AnLinear regression analysis predicting exercise performance in the presence of physical harm or injury and depressive symptomatology.

	Model 1: R² = .183 DV: Exercise in the presence of physical harm or injury					Model 2: R² = .188 DV: Depressive symptomatology
	β	CI 95%		SE	p	β	CI 95%		SE	p
	β	LB	UB	SE	p	β	LB	UB	SE	p
Age	-.147	-.295	.001	.076	.052	.068	-.034	.169	.052	.191
Gender	.267	.166	.369	.052	< .001	-.200	-.284	-.117	.043	< .001
BMI	-.084	-.232	.064	.076	.268	-.057	-.164	.050	.055	.299
Perceived health status	.050	-.058	.159	.055	.363	-.115	-.208	-.021	.048	.016
Frequency of exercise	.198	.127	.268	.036	< .001	-.058	-.167	.051	.056	.295
ED Risk	.068	-.088	.233	.079	.394	.281	.192	.371	.046	< .001
Depressive symptomatology	.193	.098	.288	.049	< .001	–	–	–	–	–
Exercise in the presence of physical harm or injury	–	–	–	–	–	.186	.111	.261	.038	< .001
Note. DV = Dependent variable, β = Standardised regression coefficient, CI 95 % = Confidence interval at 95 %, SE = Standard error, LB = Lower bound, UB = Upper bound, BMI = body mass index, ED = Eating disorder. Being female (in the context of gender) and having been classified as “not at risk” (in the context of ED risk level) were considered as the reference categories for the dichotomous variables.