Table 3

Study characteristics.

StudyPopulationTraining programme
CountryAge (years)Sample analysedFrequencyaDuration (min)No. of exercisesComponents
RBSAP
Achenbach et al. (2018)GermanyIG: 14,9 ± 0,9b
CG: 15,1 ± 1,0b
N = 174
GI: n = 98
GC: n = 76
PRE: 2/3
SEAS: 1
155✔︎✔︎✔︎
Myklebust et al. (2003)Norway21 – 22Season 1: n = 855 (58 teams)
Season 2: n = 850 (52 teams)
PRE: 3
SEAS: 1
153✔︎✔︎✔︎
Olsen et al. (2005)NorwayIG: 16,3 ± 0,6b
CG: 16,2 ± 0,6b
N = 1586
IG: n = 808
CG: n = 778
PRE: 3
SEAS: 1
15 – 204✔︎✔︎✔︎✔︎✔︎
Petersen et al. (2005)GermanyIG: 19,8
CG: 19,4
N = 276
IG: n = 134 (10 teams)
CG: n = 142 (10 teams)
PRE: 3
SEAS: 1
104✔︎✔︎
Wedderkopp et al. (1999)Denmark16 – 18N = 237
IG: n = 111
CG: n = 126
SEAS: all10 – 153✔︎
Zebis et al. (2016)DenmarkIG: 15,9 ± 0,4c
CG: 15,6 ± 0,5c
N = 40
IG: n = 20
CG: n = 20
PRE: 3
(12 weeks)
153✔︎✔︎✔︎✔︎✔︎
Note. R: running; B: balance; S: strength; A: agility; P: plyometric; IG: intervention group; CG: control group; PRE: preseason; SEAS: season.
aIn sessions per week. bThe study included men and women. cThe study included football and handball.