Table 5
Differences in attention according to diet quality.
mprovable DQ M ± DE (n = 91) | Optimal DQ M ± DE (n = 118) | F | p | d | |
Number of Correct Answers (0-60) | 38.23 ± 8.06 | 38.76 ± 10.48 | 3.886 | .763 | .09 |
Number of Errors (0-60) | 2.40 ± 0.80 | 2.67 ± 0.43 | 1.930 | .766 | .09 |
Number of Omissions (0-60) | 19.18 ± 6.35 | 18.46 ± 7.15 | 1.785 | .677 | .10 |
Inhibitory Control (1-100) | 87.05 ± 7.16 | 87.71 ± 9.38 | 1.782 | .860 | .08 |
Attentional Efficiency (1-100) | 63.62 ± 8.29 | 64.91 ± 11.28 | 3.908 | .657 | .12 |
Overall Attention Index a (1-9) | 5.18 ± 0.79 | 5.78 ± 1.05 | 2.626 | .997 | .07 |
Note: (*) p <.05. M±SD=mean±standard deviation. aGlobal Attention Index calculated from the enneatypes score. |