Table 3

Analysis of the effect of physical exercise programmes on cognitive function by length in weeks, weekly frequency, session length and type of physical exercise programme implemented.

Authors 
GDEMIC 95 %DEMIC 95 %p
Age 
< 65 years Bateman et al. 2001; Kim & Yim, 2017; Ozdemir et al. 2001; Immink et al. 2014523.477.3; 39.61.820.4; 3.3.014
≥ 65 years Tang et al. 2016; Khattab et al. 2020; Studenski et al. 2005; Quaney et al. 2009; Bo et al. 201964.47–2.8; 12.3
Weeks 
< 12 wk Kim & Yim, 2017; Ozdemir et al. 2001; Quaney et al. 2009; Immink et al. 2014521.974.4; 39.61.330.0; 2.7.051
≥ 12 wk Bateman et al. 2001; Tang et al. 2016; Khattab et al. 2020; Studenski et al. 2005; Bo et al. 201966.02–3.3; 15.3
Frequency 
3 ses/wk Bateman et al. 2001; Tang et al. 2016; Khattab et al. 2020; Quaney et al. 2009; Bo et al. 201976.66–1.0; 14.3–1.16–2.5; 0.2.091
3 ses/wk Kim & Yim, 2017; Ozdemir et al. 2001; Immink et al. 2014424.831.6; 48.1
Session length 
< 60 minutesBateman et al. 2001; Quaney et al. 2009; Immink et al. 2014; Bo et al. 201949.35–7.9; 26.6–0.44–1.7; 0.8.492
≥ 60 minutesTang et al. 2016; Khattab et al. 2020; Studenski et al. 2005; Ozdemir et al. 2001; Kim & Yim, 2017715.511.9; 29.8
Exercise type EA vs. ST (groups) 
EABateman et al. 2001; Tang et al. 2016; Khattab et al. 2020; Quaney et al. 2009510.463.3; 17.6–1.88–3.7; –0.1.039
EFOzdemir et al. 2001; Immink et al. 2014328.87–8.1; 65.9
Exercise type EA vs. EA+EF (groups)
EABateman et al. 2001; Tang et al. 2016; Khattab et al. 2020; Quaney et al. 2009510.463.3; 17.61.11–0.5; 2.7.163
EA+EFStudenski et al. 2005; Kim & Yim, 2017; Bo et al. 201932.34–21.5; 26.2
Exercise type vs. EA+EF (groups)
EFOzdemir et al. 2001; Immink et al. 2014328.87–8.1; 65.92.12–0.1; 4.3.056
EA+EFStudenski et al. 2005; Kim & Yim, 2017; Bo et al. 201932.34–21.5; 26.2
Note. G: groups; AT: aerobic training; ST: strength training; ses: sessions; wk: week.