Table 3
Invariance Analysis by Sex of the TPSAMS
| χ2 | Δχ2 | df | CFI | ΔCFI | TLI | ΔTLI | RMSEA | ΔRMSEA | SRMR | ΔSRMR | |
| Model 0. Male | 302.85 | – | 160 | .92 | – | .90 | – | .06 | – | .07 | – |
| Model 0. Female | 296.37 | – | 160 | .91 | – | .90 | – | .08 | – | .07 | – |
| Model 1. Configural invariance | 599.51 | – | 320 | .92 | – | .90 | – | .07 | – | .07 | – |
| Model 2. Metric invariance | 609.57 | 10.06 | 335 | .92 | < .01 | .91 | < .01 | .07 | < .01 | . 07 | < .01 |
| Model 3. Scalar invariance | 629.24 | 19.67 | 350 | .92 | < .01 | .91 | < .01 | .07 | < .01 | .07 | < .01 |
| Model 4. Strict invariance | 688.99 | 59.75 | 390 | .91 | < .01 | .91 | < .01 | .07 | < .01 | .09 | .02 |
