Table 2
Rubric embedded in the form to evaluate the team presentations.
| Punctuation | |||||
| Items | Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Adequate (2) | Deficient (1) | Percentage of qualification |
| Integration of concepts | Good domain of the concepts and respond coherently to the questions. | Understand the explained phenomenon but have difficulties to link some concepts. | Need some rectifications about the usage of the concepts. | Have no understanding of the concepts. | 40 % |
| Collaborative work | The presentation shows planification and collaborative work. All the members participate actively. | The presentation shows planification, but some members present deviations from the group’s framework. | The presentation shows some planification, but with different levels of participation among the members. | There is no collaboration or even no participation by the members. | 40 % |
| Originality and quality | Original topic. Adequate and attractive visual support. | Original topic. Adequate but few attractive visual support. | Non-original topic. Adequate visual support. | Non-original topic. Inadequate visual support. | 20 % |
