Tabla 3
Efectos del uso de estrategias discursivas agrupadas en dimensiones, por curso escolar
| Dimensión | Categoría/ítems | M | DT | Z | p |
| 1 | 1 | 2.96 | 1.048 | –1.357 | .175 |
| 1 | 2 | 2.30 | 0.797 | –0.091 | .928 |
| 1 | 3 | 2.17 | 0.808 | –1.114 | .265 |
| 1 | 7 | 1.60 | 0.792 | –1.349 | .177 |
| 1 | 12 | 2.71 | 1.050 | –1.747 | .081 |
| 1 | 13 | 2.67 | 0.926 | –0.195 | .845 |
| 1 | 17 | 2.04 | 0.866 | –0.039 | .969 |
| 1 | 20 | 1.69 | 0.750 | –1.863 | .062 |
| 2 | 4 | 2.08 | 0.997 | –1.144 | .253 |
| 2 | 6 | 1.65 | 0.806 | –2.528 | .011* |
| 2 | 10 | 1.83 | 0.831 | –1.246 | .213 |
| 2 | 11 | 1.75 | 0.857 | –2.645 | .008* |
| 2 | 16 | 2.19 | 0.941 | –1.791 | .073 |
| 2 | 21 | 1.93 | 0.853 | –3.661 | <.001** |
| 2 | 22 | 2.01 | 0.905 | –3.205 | .001** |
| 3 | 5 | 1.43 | 0.685 | –1.992 | .046* |
| 3 | 8 | 1.86 | 0.800 | –0.789 | .430 |
| 3 | 9 | 2.47 | 1.004 | –2.432 | .015* |
| 3 | 14 | 1.94 | 0.839 | –3.332 | <.001** |
| 3 | 15 | 1.63 | 0.787 | –1.213 | .225 |
| 3 | 18 | 2.31 | 0.987 | –0.462 | .644 |
| 3 | 19 | 1.66 | 0.828 | –0.460 | .646 |
| Nota. M = Media; DT = Desviación típica; Z = Valor de Z; p < .05 | |||||
