Subscale \u201cSubject Satisfaction\u201d of the Subject Assessment Questionnaire<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/td> Academic year<\/td> <\/td> <\/td><\/tr> <\/td> 2017\/2018<\/td> 2018\/2019 <\/td> p<\/em>–
value<\/td>d<\/em><\/td><\/tr> <\/td> M<\/em><\/td> SD<\/em><\/em><\/td> M<\/em><\/td> SD<\/em><\/em><\/td><\/tr> 1. The teaching guide is helpful for planning my work<\/td> 3.42<\/td> 1.27<\/td> 3.41<\/td> 1.17<\/td> .69<\/td> 0.01<\/td><\/tr> 2. The subject does not overlap with content covered in other subjects<\/td> 3.90<\/td> 1.08<\/td> 4.31<\/td> 0.94<\/td> .56<\/td> 0.43<\/td><\/tr> 3. The class plan is appropriate for achieving the subject\u2019s objectives<\/td> 3.80<\/td> 1.00<\/td> 4.03<\/td> 0.94<\/td> .22<\/td> 0.24<\/td><\/tr> 4. The references used are helpful for following the subject<\/td> 3.91<\/td> 1.07<\/td> 4.05<\/td> 1.00<\/td> .61<\/td> 0.14<\/td><\/tr> 5. The assessment system is appropriate for evaluating student progress<\/td> 3.83<\/td> 1.29<\/td> 3.98<\/td> 0.98<\/td> .73<\/td> 0.14<\/td><\/tr> Note. M <\/em>= Mean; SD<\/em> = Standard Deviation; d<\/em>\u00a0=\u00a0Effect size.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n