{"id":70146,"date":"2025-12-23T07:50:21","date_gmt":"2025-12-23T07:50:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/tablas\/tabla-5-163-01\/"},"modified":"2025-12-27T09:20:17","modified_gmt":"2025-12-27T09:20:17","slug":"tabla-5-163-01","status":"publish","type":"tablas","link":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/tablas\/tabla-5-163-01\/","title":{"rendered":"Table 5 \u2013 163.01"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Table 5<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><em><em><em><em><em><em><em><em>Characteristics of the included studies: instruments and main results<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<table class=\"wp-block-advgb-table advgb-table-frontend\"><tbody><tr><td style=\"border-top-color:#000;border-bottom-color:#000\">Author (year)<\/td><td style=\"border-top-color:#000;border-bottom-color:#000\">Instruments and measures<\/td><td style=\"border-top-color:#000;border-bottom-color:#000\">Results<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Agne et al. (2022)<\/td><td>Accelerometer; graded exercise test on ergometer;&nbsp; 6RM strength test; SF-36; BMI;&nbsp; Anthropometry.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Improvements in quality of life in CG and SG, with larger effects in SG.&nbsp; The EG improved anthropometric differences without affecting skinfolds, body weight, or BMI.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bakland et al. (2019)<\/td><td>Semi-structured interview.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Improvement in knowledge and in the application of PE and nutrition; positive evaluation of the support received during the intervention.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bratland-Sanda and Vrabel (2018)<\/td><td>&nbsp;EDE-Q; SCL-5; BMI.<\/td><td>Significant reduction in EDE-Q and SCL-5 scores, and in exercise, along with an increase in BMI.&nbsp;<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bratland-Sanda et al. (2012)<\/td><td>EDE v12; EDI v2; accelerometer; Bruce treadmill protocol; 1RM test; body composition; BMI; DXA.<\/td><td>Patients with BMI &lt; 18.5: increase in lower-body muscle strength, mean total body mass, fat mass, lean body mass, and BMI.&nbsp; Patients with BMI \u2265 18.5: increase in upper-body muscle strength, fat mass, and BMI. Positive correlation between BMI and the EDI subscales of body dissatisfaction and bulimia, and negative correlation with the EDE restraint subscale.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Bratland-Sanda et al. (2018)<\/td><td>EDE v16; CET; 1RM test (half squats and bench press); BMD; DXA; energy intake (kcal\/day) and daily PA (min\/week); questionnaire on the intervention.<\/td><td>Improvement in the 1RM test and in BMD, with self-perceived psychological benefits.&nbsp; No changes were observed in menstrual dysfunction, weight, EDE, or CET.&nbsp;<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Brennan et al. (2020)<\/td><td>EDE-Q 6.0; DERS; FSCRS; SCS-SF; TMS; ATSPPH-SF.<\/td><td>Only the EG showed improvements in binge-eating episode frequency, emotion regulation difficulties, self-criticism, self-compassion, and the ability to achieve mindfulness.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Dauty et al. (2022)<\/td><td>BMI; muscle strength (knee, biceps and triceps brachii, and handgrip); Shirado-Ito test; Biering-Sorensen test; balance; 6MWT; spirometry; hip DXA.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Weight gain, BMI, fat mass (trunk, upper and lower limbs) and BMD parameters remain stable.&nbsp; Significant improvement in walking distance, balance, respiratory function, upper- and lower-limb strength, and trunk strength endurance.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Diers et al. (2020)<\/td><td>BSQ; 5 self-developed open-ended questions.<\/td><td>Improved BSQ scores, mixed responses on post-intervention self-perception of body image.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Fern\u00e1ndez-del-Valle et al. (2015a)<\/td><td>6RM test (bench press, leg press, and lateral row). ISAK anthropometry: BMI, TSF (mm), MTSF (mm), MUAC (cm), and MTC (cm); AMA (cm\u00b2) and MTMA (cm\u00b2) calculated using Heymsfield equations.<\/td><td>In the post-training phase, the EG was in higher percentile categories for MUAC and MTC compared with the CG, and AMA either increased or remained within the same range.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Fern\u00e1ndez-del-Valle et al. (2015b)<\/td><td>6RM test (bench press, leg press, and lateral row); body weight (kg); height (m); skinfolds: biceps, triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac (mm); thigh, arm, and calf circumferences (cm); BMI; Durnin equation (Bd); Heyward equation (%BF); Poortmans equation (SMM).<\/td><td>Increase in BMI, skeletal muscle mass and relative strength in EG. Increases in fat mass in the CG. The group effect was not significant for SMM, FM, or %BF.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Fern\u00e1ndez-del-Valle et al. (2014)<\/td><td>Accelerometer; graded treadmill test; BMI; muscle strength (seated bench press, seated lateral row, seated leg press); 3-m and 10-m TUG; TUDS.&nbsp;<\/td><td>Significantly greater improvement in the EG compared with the CG after the intervention in leg press, bench press, and lateral row, as well as beneficial effects on agility.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Fisher and Schenkman (2012)<\/td><td>Musculoskeletal system: Upper\/lower quartile screening, weight, height, BMI, numerical rating scale. Neuromuscular system: light sensitivity, AROM, observation Cardiopulmonary system: Cardiopulmonary system: BP, resting HR, activity HR, oxygen saturation. Integumentary system: ulcer identification. Cognitive system: orientation \u00d73. Others: blood glucose level, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry test; FIM, TUG(s), POMA, 3MWT.<\/td><td>Mean gain of 1.32 kg\/week; recovery of independence in daily activities (improvements in FIM); improvements in POMA (postural stability Pre&nbsp;=&nbsp;17; Post&nbsp;=&nbsp;24), in TUG score (Pre&nbsp;=&nbsp;19.27; Post&nbsp;=&nbsp;11.00 s), and in walking speed (Pre&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.35; Post&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.81 m\/s).&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Galasso et al. (2018)<\/td><td>BMI; 6MWT&nbsp;<\/td><td>Non-significant greater reduction in BMI and 6MWT in the EG compared with the CG.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Galasso et al. (2020)<\/td><td>BMI; BES; BITE; 6MWT; ST.&nbsp;<br><\/td><td>Improvement in both CG and EG in anthropometric measures, ED symptoms, and exercise capacity. Significantly greater improvement in the EG compared with the CG&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lampe et al. (2022)<\/td><td>EDE-Q; EDE subscales: Shape Concern and Weight Concern; EMA; PANAS; accelerometer; item on weekly duration of moderate-to-vigorous PA.<\/td><td>Reduction in weight and shape concern, negative affect, and binge and compensatory\/purging episodes. Weekly PE goals were not achieved, and perceived control over weight did not decrease.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Martin et al. (2017)<\/td><td>Sociodemographic questionnaire; physical examination; blood analysis (sex steroids and vitamin D); BMI. Measurement of vital signs every 4 hours; pulse and blood pressure at rest after 5 minutes of rest and after standing for 2 minutes.<\/td><td>Significantly greater reduction in VSS in the EG compared with the CG, but no differences in BSAP, NTX, osteocalcin, weight, or length of stay.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Mart\u00ednez-S\u00e1nchez et al. (2020)<\/td><td>BIA; blood biochemical composition; accelerometer; ALPHA-Fitness Battery: handgrip strength, upper-body strength, standing long jump test, 4\u00d710 m shuttle run test, 20 m shuttle run test.<\/td><td>After the program, height, plasma calcium, and sleep efficiency increased significantly, while plasma follicle-stimulating hormone, sleep duration, and nighttime disturbances decreased. Overall, no differences were detected in body composition.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Mathisen et al. (2018a)<sup>1<\/sup><\/td><td>Seca scale, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, fat mass, %fat mass, lean body mass, VAT, WHR, BMD; CRF; 1RM test: Smith machine squats, bench press, and seated cable row; categorization into high-risk groups for non-communicable disease if at least two of the three high-risk assessment categories are met: (1) elevated BMI, high body fat percentage, or masked obesity; (2) elevated VAT levels; and\/or (3) low VO<sub>2<\/sub>peak.<\/td><td>Improvement in the EG compared with the CG (with moderate to large effect sizes) in mean absolute VO<sub>2<\/sub>peak, 1RM test for squat, bench press, and seated row, proximal femur BMD, and proximal femur BMD-Z. Body composition deteriorated in both groups during follow-up. Neither PED-t nor CBT reduced the risk of non-communicable diseases.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Mathisen et al. (2018b)<sup>2<\/sup><\/td><td>EDE-Q; CET; ActiGraph Accelerometer<\/td><td>Reduction in EG of CE from baseline, but no difference with CG.&nbsp; The proportion of participants meeting the official PA recommendation did not change or differ between groups after the intervention.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Vancampfort et al. 2014a)<\/td><td>EDE-Q; 6MWT; SF-36; BPA; PSPP<\/td><td>Significant improvement in all parameters (except occupational PA, physical strength, and self-esteem) after 6 months. Increased participation in sports activities (large effect size) and a reduction (small effect size) in the number of binge episodes, which was associated with significant improvements in quality of life.&nbsp; Significant increases in leisure-time PA (BPA) were associated with significant improvements in quality of life (SF-36) and increased perceived sport competence, physical condition, and body attractiveness.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td style=\"border-top-color:#000\" colspan=\"3\"><em>Note. <\/em>AG\u00a0=\u00a0android-to-gynoid fat mass ratio; ALPHA Fitness Battery\u00a0=\u00a0Assessing Levels of Physical Activity and Fitness; AMA\u00a0=\u00a0Arm Muscle Area; Anthropometry ISAK\u00a0=\u00a0Anthropometry following International Standards for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; AROM\u00a0=\u00a0Active Range of Motion; ATSPPH-SF\u00a0=\u00a0Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help \u2013 Short Form; Bd\u00a0=\u00a0Body Density; BES\u00a0=\u00a0Binge Eating Scale; BIA\u00a0=\u00a0Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis; BITE\u00a0=\u00a0Bulimic Investigatory Test, Edinburgh; BMD\u00a0=\u00a0Bone Mineral Density; BMI\u00a0=\u00a0Body Mass Index; BP\u00a0=\u00a0Blood Pressure; BPA\u00a0=\u00a0Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire; BSAP\u00a0=\u00a0Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase; BSQ\u00a0=\u00a0Body Shape Questionnaire; CBT\u00a0=\u00a0Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; CE\u00a0=\u00a0Compulsive Exercise; CET\u00a0=\u00a0Compulsive Exercise Test; CRF\u00a0=\u00a0Cardiorespiratory Fitness; DERS\u00a0=\u00a0Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; DXA\u00a0=\u00a0Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry; EDE v12\u00a0=\u00a0Eating Disorder Examination v12; EDE v16\u00a0=\u00a0Eating Disorder Examination v16; EDE-Q v6\u00a0=\u00a0Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire v6.0; EDI\u00a0=\u00a0Eating Disorder Inventory v2; EMA\u00a0=\u00a0Ecological Momentary Assessment; FIM\u00a0=\u00a0Functional Independence Measure; FM\u00a0=\u00a0Fat Mass; FSCRS\u00a0=\u00a0Forms of Self-Criticizing\/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale; HR\u00a0=\u00a0Heart Rate; MTMA\u00a0=\u00a0Mid-Thigh Muscle Area; MTC\u00a0=\u00a0Mid-Thigh Circumference; MTSF\u00a0=\u00a0Mid-Thigh Skinfold Thickness; MUAC\u00a0=\u00a0Mid-Upper Arm Circumference; NTX\u00a0=\u00a0Serum N-Telopeptide; PANAS\u00a0=\u00a0Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; PED-t\u00a0=\u00a0Physical Exercise and Dietary Therapy; POMA\u00a0=\u00a0Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment; PSPP\u00a0=\u00a0Physical Self-Perception Profile; SCL-5\u00a0=\u00a0Symptom Checklist-5; SCS-SF\u00a0=\u00a0Self-Compassion Scale \u2013 Short Form; SF-36\u00a0=\u00a036-Item Short Form Health Survey; SMM\u00a0=\u00a0Skeletal Muscle Mass; ST\u00a0=\u00a0Strength Test; TMS\u00a0=\u00a0Toronto Mindfulness Scale; TSF\u00a0=\u00a0Triceps Skinfold Thickness; TUDS\u00a0=\u00a0Timed Up and Down Stairs Test; TUG\u00a0=\u00a0Timed Up and Go Test; VAT\u00a0=\u00a0Visceral Adipose Tissue; VSS\u00a0=\u00a0Vital Signs Stable; 3MWT\u00a0=\u00a03 Minutes Walking Test; 6MWT\u00a0=\u00a06 Minutes Walking Test; %BF\u00a0=\u00a0relative body fat.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-background no-border-radius wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/physical-exercise-as-an-adjunctive-treatment-in-eating-disorders-a-systematic-review\/#volver1630105\" style=\"background-color:#3B70E8\">Back to article<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"template":"","featured_img":false,"coauthors":[],"author_meta":{"author_link":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/author\/finderwilber\/","display_name":"finderwilber"},"relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 3 months ago","modified":"Updated 3 months ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on 23 December 2025","modified":"Updated on 27 December 2025"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on 23 December 2025 07:50","modified":"Updated on 27 December 2025 09:20"},"featured_img_caption":"","tax_additional":[],"series_order":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tablas\/70146\/"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tablas\/"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/tablas\/"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tablas\/70146\/revisions\/"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70173,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tablas\/70146\/revisions\/70173\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/?parent=70146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}