Percentages of responses to the Knowledge Integration Questionnaire.\u00a0<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nQuestions<\/td> CG (n\u00a0<\/em>=\u00a0140)<\/td> EG (n<\/em>\u00a0=\u00a0147)<\/td><\/tr> Pre<\/td> Post<\/td> Pre<\/td> Post<\/td><\/tr> Yes<\/td> Yes<\/td> Yes<\/td> Yes\/correct<\/td><\/tr> 1. Do you think it is scientifically interesting to explain any natural phenomenon with the same concepts?<\/td> 44 (31%)<\/td> 47 (34%)<\/td> 49 (33%)<\/td> 126 (86%)* \u0197<\/td><\/tr> 2.1 Can you identify common principles of CAS and general concepts of DST in biological, psychological and sociological processes?<\/td> 23 (16%)<\/td> 25 (18%)<\/td> 22 (15%)<\/td> 133 (90%)* \u0197<\/td><\/tr> 2.2 Which ones?<\/td> 1 (0.71%)<\/td> 1 (0.71%)<\/td> 2 (1.36%)<\/td> 118 (80%) \u0197<\/td><\/tr> 3. Can you use the general concepts (attractors, instability, variability, synergies, etc.) to explain a phenomenon such as a social revolution?<\/td> 1 (0.71%)<\/td> 1 (0.71%)<\/td> 2 (1.36%)<\/td> 109 (74%)* \u0197<\/td><\/tr> 4. And for explaining an organic injury?<\/td> 1 (0.71%)<\/td> 1 (0.71%)<\/td> 2 (1.36%)<\/td> 116 (79%)* \u0197<\/td><\/tr> Notes: *Significant differences when compared with the post-CG data. \u0197 Significant differences when compared with the pre-EG data. CG = control group, EG = experimental group; CAS = complex adaptive systems, DST = dynamic systems theory. 2.2 question was a descriptive response to confirm 2.1 question.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n