Rubric embedded in the form to evaluate the team presentations.<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\nPunctuation<\/td><\/tr> Items<\/td> Excellent (4)<\/td> Good (3)<\/td> Adequate (2)<\/td> Deficient (1)<\/td> Percentage of qualification<\/td><\/tr> Integration
of concepts<\/td>Good domain of the concepts and respond coherently to the questions.<\/td> Understand the explained phenomenon but have difficulties to link some concepts.<\/td> Need some rectifications about the usage of the concepts.<\/td> Have no understanding of the concepts.<\/td> 40\u2006%<\/td><\/tr> Collaborative work<\/td> The presentation shows planification and collaborative work. All the members participate actively.<\/td> The presentation shows planification, but some members present deviations from the group\u2019s framework.<\/td> The presentation shows some planification, but with different levels of participation among the members.<\/td> There is no collaboration or even no participation by the members.<\/td> 40\u2006%<\/td><\/tr> Originality
and quality<\/td>Original topic. Adequate and attractive visual support.<\/td> Original topic. Adequate but few attractive visual support.<\/td> Non-original topic. Adequate visual support.<\/td> Non-original topic. Inadequate visual support.<\/td> 20\u2006%<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n