Multivariate analysis of the variables under study within each cluster of personal and social responsibility.<\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>Cluster 1<\/td> Cluster 2<\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>n<\/em> = 131; 52 boys, 79 girls; <\/em>
64 primary, 67 secondary<\/em><\/td>n<\/em> = 165; 86 boys, 79 girls;
75 primary, 90 secondary<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
<\/td>M<\/td> SD<\/td> M<\/td> SD<\/td> F<\/td><\/tr> Prosocial behaviour<\/td> 4.63<\/td> 0.71<\/td> 3.96<\/td> 0.82<\/td> 56.21**<\/td><\/tr> Antisocial behaviour<\/td> 2.24<\/td> 0.60<\/td> 2.23<\/td> 0.67<\/td> 0.00<\/td><\/tr> Perspective-taking<\/td> 3.80<\/td> 0.81<\/td> 3.16<\/td> 0.84<\/td> 43.71**<\/td><\/tr> Fantasy<\/td> 3.51<\/td> 0.97<\/td> 2.71<\/td> 0.92<\/td> 52.33*<\/td><\/tr> Empathic concern<\/td> 3.83<\/td> 0.85<\/td> 3.12<\/td> 0.84<\/td> 52.06**<\/td><\/tr> Personal distress<\/td> 2.94<\/td> 0.89<\/td> 2.60<\/td> 0.80<\/td> 12.02**<\/td><\/tr> Experienced violence<\/td> 1.74<\/td> 0.59<\/td> 1.64<\/td> 0.57<\/td> 0.99<\/td><\/tr> Observed violence<\/td> 2.24<\/td> 0.78<\/td> 2.32<\/td> 0.86<\/td> 0.69<\/td><\/tr> Comparative perception of PA<\/td> 3.93<\/td> 0.99<\/td> 2.83<\/td> 1.03<\/td> 86.28**<\/td><\/tr> Perception of PA level<\/td> 4.82<\/td> 1.40<\/td> 2.43<\/td> 1.23<\/td> 243.10**<\/td><\/tr> Wilks\u039b<\/td>
<\/td>
<\/td>
<\/td>
<\/td>.369<\/td><\/tr> Multivariate f<\/td>
<\/td>
<\/td>
<\/td>
<\/td>.16**<\/td><\/tr> Note: *p<\/em>\u00a0<\u00a0.05; **p<\/em>\u00a0<\u00a0.01; M = Mean; SD = Standard Deviation; PA = Physical Activity; F = Fisher (ratio of two variances); Wilks\u039b\u00a0=\u00a0Wilk’s lambda (variance ratio to test the hypothesis).<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n