{"id":71855,"date":"2026-04-01T10:21:55","date_gmt":"2026-04-01T10:21:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/?p=71855"},"modified":"2026-07-08T10:01:22","modified_gmt":"2026-07-08T10:01:22","slug":"enhancing-critical-thinking-and-resilience-in-a-teacher-education-masters-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/enhancing-critical-thinking-and-resilience-in-a-teacher-education-masters-program\/","title":{"rendered":"Enhancing Critical Thinking and Resilience in a Teacher Education Master\u2019s Program\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Abstract<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This study analyzes the effects of a gamification project inspired by the television series Black Mirror<\/em> to evaluate critical thinking, resilience, and social and emotional skills in students enrolled in a Master\u2019s in Education program (concentration in physical education). The idea arose from the need to address emotional and educational challenges during the college years, particularly in the training of future teachers, who must acquire solid social and emotional skills to manage complex educational situations. The intervention included a sample of 26 students, a quasi-experimental design, and pre- and post-intervention measurements. The project also featured an ad hoc mobile application designed to provoke the same feelings and emotions as those portrayed in the \u201cNosedive\u201d episode of Black Mirror<\/em>, a fundamental aspect in any gamification project. The results showed statistically meaningful improvements in all the dimensions of critical thinking, with especially strong effects in recognition of assumptions and in the overall score. Some 96% of the students also increased their initial resilience score. Regarding emotional intelligence, more than half of the students shifted from having low or excessive attention to feelings to more adequate levels, although no meaningful changes were detected in the \u201cclarity\u201d or \u201cemotional regulation\u201d variables. These findings support the value of meaningful narratives, technological resources, and student-centered strategies in fostering the development of teaching skills that can be applied to their future teaching careers.<\/p>\n\n\n

Keywords:<\/strong> critical thinking<\/span>, gamification<\/span>, higher education<\/span>, inteligencia emocional<\/span>, inteligencia emocional<\/span>, inteligencia emocional<\/span>, resilience<\/span><\/p> <\/div> \n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Education systems have recently undergone various structural and pedagogical transformations that often do not prioritize the emotional needs of students (Pe\u00f1a-Casares & Aguaded-Ram\u00edrez, 2019<\/a>). In this sense, it is essential to restore the importance of emotional intelligence, as it is one of the main predictors of both academic and professional success (Men\u00e9ndez, 2018<\/a>). The college years are a crucial period for developing these social and emotional skills, as this environment involves academic and social adaptation challenges that require effective strategies and openness to creative solutions (Raj et al., 2022<\/a>). In fact, college students were one of the most vulnerable groups to the consequences of the pandemic (Browning et al., 2022<\/a>), which had a negative impact on their mental health, as evidenced in higher levels of anxiety, stress, and mood disorders (Charles et al., 2021<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With this in mind, it is essential to provide students with tools that foster the development of cross-cutting skillsand competencies related to problem-solving and adaptation to change, as these are highly transferable to their personal and professional lives (Bezanilla et al., 2021<\/a>). This need is even more pronounced in the training of future teachers,<\/strong> since developing emotional intelligence-related strategies not only impacts their well-being but also strengthens their motivation and professional commitment (Paraguay-Delgado y Teves-Quispe, 2024<\/a>; Rabal-Alonso y Gonz\u00e1lez-Romero, 2023<\/a>). Within the development of emotional intelligence as a whole, we focus on three social and emotional skills or competencies: attention to feelings, clarity, and emotional regulation. Attention to feelings refers to the ability to identify and recognize emotions or feelings; clarity refers to the ability to understand and describe one\u2019s own emotions; and emotional regulation refers to the ability to control emotions, both positive and negative, which may be experienced with varying degrees of intensity (American Psychological Association, 2018<\/a>). Emotional regulation is also associated with the ability to flexibly and consciously modulate emotional responses, which entails dynamic adaptation (Gross, 2015<\/a>). This involves evaluating one\u2019s experiences and developing the ability to respond to them, preparing individuals to act in diverse situations (Cole et al., 2004<\/a>). Research such as that by Fern\u00e1ndez-Mart\u00ednez et al. (2017)<\/a> or You (2016)<\/a> have explored the connection between emotional regulation, resilience, and students\u2019 commitment to learning, concluding that students with greater resilience are more committed, and consequently perform better academically. Resilience, which is conditioned by psychological, physiological, and sociological factors, is an essential resource for adaptively coping with adverse situations (Chen & Bonnano, 2020<\/a>; Valverde-Janer et al., 2023<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Together with social and emotional skills, critical thinking is another fundamental ability during this stage and is understood as the ability to examine, draw logical conclusions, question, and organize information effectively (Eales-Reynolds et al., 2013<\/a>). This skill is key to problem-solving in different contexts and is essential for analyzing the veracity of information and making important decisions (Karaku\u015f, 2024<\/a>). Not only cognitive abilities are important, but also the willingness to think critically; that is, the internal motivation to use reasoning, question assumptions, and evaluate objectivity (Yilmaz y Salman, 2022<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To meet these educational demands, we must foster students\u2019 autonomy, self-awareness, decision-making, and emotion management (Muntaner-Guasp et al., 2020<\/a>), while promoting methodological approaches in which teachers facilitate learning and students remain the true protagonists (Hailikari et al., 2022<\/a>). In this vein, scientific research shows that when gamification incorporates the diverse pillars and triggers required for its implementation (P\u00e9rez-L\u00f3pez i Navarro-Mateos, 2023<\/a>), it has strong potential to foster both resilience and emotional intelligence in higher education settings (Navarro-Mateos et al., 2024<\/a>; P\u00e9rez-L\u00f3pez et al., 2025<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, with the aim of fostering the development of skills that are fundamental in the early stages of future teacher training, such as critical thinking, resilience, and attention to feelings, we conducted a gamification project with a group of Master\u2019s in Education students.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Implementation of the Experience<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The gamification project was based on the television series Black Mirror<\/em>. This choice was made, on the one hand, because of the educational value of the series, which consistently questions the ethical implications of the use of technology, and, on the other hand, because of its relevance to the students, as previously identified through a survey of their interests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The course content and skills were connected to various episodes of Black Mirror<\/em>, with each class starting with a clip from an episode to encourage reflection and a subsequent debate among the students. The theme of the project was inspired by the first episode of season three, titled \u201cNosedive\u201d. This episode presents a world in which social ratings recorded in a mobile application determine status and access to opportunities. In this world, people are continuously rated via their smartphones, with every social interaction rated from one to five stars. To recreate the emotions and feelings experienced in the episode, which is one of the fundamental pillars of gamification according to Model 10-40 (P\u00e9rez-L\u00f3pez y Navarro-Mateos, 2023<\/a>), an ad hoc application similar to the one used in the episode was designed for the project (Figure 1). Using their smartphones, students rated their classmates based on the quality of their contributions in class, the presentation of the training challenges they completed, and their interactions with one another (inside and outside the classroom). The ratings were anonymous, meaning that only the recipient could view them. The ratings also impacted the course, as they determined the students\u2019 options for choosing their partner, date, and topic for the practical session they had to prepare; they also provided advantages when completing the educational challenges available to them. As a result, this created a tense, high-pressure atmosphere that tested the group\u2019s emotional skills, promoting emotional regulation and, in many cases, resilience. At the same time, it helped the students become fully immersed in the narrative by faithfully recreating what the protagonists in the episode experienced. Using fiction as a basis for reality, we created a real-life setting in which to develop critical thinking for future transfer to teaching roles. The wide range of situations that arose from the ratings given and received by the participants (and the reasons behind them ) led students to question their appropriateness, as well as the reactions they elicited in their classmates, not only from a theoretical perspective but also through their own personal experience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/
Application created for the project<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Method<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Study Design and Sample<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This study was framed within the positivist paradigm of research and used a quantitative approach, as it focused on the objective evaluation of an innovative educational intervention targeting critical thinking, resilience, and social and emotional skills (attention to feelings, clarity, and emotional regulation). The study employed a one-group quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-measurements and evaluated the impact of a gamification activity based on the television series Black Mirror<\/em>, comparing the students\u2019 results before and after the intervention. Quasi-experimental designs are common in action research studies, in real-life classroom settings with a natural, non-randomized group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The sample included 26 students from the Master\u2019s in Education program (group 3), consisting of 12 women and 14 men. All students were enrolled in the course \u201cLearning and Teaching Physical Education\u201d which is part of the Master\u2019s in Secondary Education, Teaching Training, and Language Teaching (Physical Education concentration) at the University of Granada. The study\u2019s ethical standards were ensured through an approved informed consent process that guaranteed participant confidentiality and anonymity (University of Granada Human Research Ethics Review Committee, approval code 5268\/CEIH\/2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main objectives of the course included developing the fundamental skills of a physical education teacher; learning and analyzing the curricular elements of physical education; planning and evaluating from a critical perspective; and demonstrating the acquisition of essential practices for developing effective teaching strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Study Variables<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Critical thinking<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

We used the validated Critical Thinking Questionnaire (Zald\u00edvar, 2010<\/a>), which has demonstrated adequate reliability and internal consistency in the Spanish population (Cronbach\u2019s \u03b1\u00a0=\u00a0.81). The questionnaire consists of 20 items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (\u201cNever\u201d) to 6 (\u201cAlways\u201d). Three well-defined dimensions of critical thinking were derived from the 20 items: recognition of assumptions (taking information as true in view of a future action, as a product of reflection on the environment), evaluation of arguments (distinguishing between the ability to narrate, express, and argue with consistent ideas versus weak arguments, without deviating from the topic when responding), and interpretation (understanding reality based on conclusions drawn beyond reasonable doubt and identifying solutions to problems). The total score was calculated by summing the items within each dimension.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Resilience<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Spanish version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) (Connor & Davidson, 2003<\/a>; Notario-Pacheco et al., 2011<\/a>) was used to assess university students\u2019 resilience. This questionnaire has demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach\u2019s \u03b1\u00a0=\u00a0.85) and high internal consistency, with an intraclass correlation test-retest coefficient of .71 when validated in Spanish population (Notario-Pacheco et al., 2011<\/a>). The questionnaire consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (\u201cNever\u201d) to 4 (\u201cAlmost Always\u201d). The resilience variable was calculated based on the sum of the scores of the 10 items, resulting in a range from 0 to 40 points, with higher score indicating higher levels of resilience.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Emotional intelligence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

We used the Spanish version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS) to measure students\u2019 emotional intelligence (Fernandez-Berrocal et al., 2004<\/a>; Salovey et al., 1995<\/a>). This questionnaire has been validated in a Spanish sample and has demonstrated adequate reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach\u2019s \u03b1\u00a0=\u00a0.90). It consists of 24 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (\u201cStrongly disagree\u201d) to 5 (\u201cStrongly agree\u201d). The 24 items were divided into 3 dimensions of 8 items each: attention to feelings (the ability to identify and recognize one\u2019s own feelings), clarity of feelings (the ability to understand and clearly describe one\u2019s own feelings), and emotional regulation or repair (the ability to control one\u2019s own emotions, both positive and negative). The scores for each dimension ranged from 8 to 40 points (summatory). For this study, a three-category variable was calculated for each dimension of emotional intelligence, with different cutoff points for women and men. Accordingly, attention to feelings was classified as \u201clow,\u201d \u201cadequate,\u201d or \u201cexcessive,\u201d whereas clarity and emotional regulation were each classified as \u201clow,\u201d \u201cadequate,\u201d or \u201cexcellent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Statistical Analysis<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The descriptive characteristics of the sample are presented based on to the pre-intervention measurements and are expressed as means and standard deviations (SDs<\/em>) for continuous variables and as frequencies and percentages for the categorical variables. Prior to the inferential analyses, the normality of the dependent variables was assessed through visual inspection of histograms and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (Lilliefors, 1967<\/a>). Since the variables followed a normal distribution, Student\u2019s t<\/em>-test for related samples and the McNemar-Bowker test (Bowker, 1948<\/a>) were used to examine the effect of the Black Mirror<\/em> intervention on continuous and categorical variables, respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Specifically, Student\u2019s t<\/em>-test was used to examine pre- and post-intervention differences in the different dimensions of critical thinking, as well as in resilience. In addition to p<\/em> values, effect sizes were reported using Cohen\u2019s d <\/em>to evaluate the practical relevance of the observed changes. According to the conventional criteria (Cohen, 1988<\/a>), values close to 0.2 indicated a small effect, values around 0.5 indicated a medium effect, and values of 0.8 or higher indicated a large effect.
For the ordinal categorical variables corresponding to the dimensions of emotional intelligence (attention, clarity, and regulation), the McNemar-Bowker test was used to evaluate the pre- and post-intervention changes in the distribution of frequencies across categories (e.g., between low, adequate, and excessive categories for the attention to feelings dimension). All statistical analyses and graphs were performed using RStudio<\/em> software (v2023.12.1 + R 4.4.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Results<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Table 1 presents the descriptive characteristics of the total sample, segmented by sex. The only dimension that showed a significant difference between sexes (p<\/em> = .039) in the pre-intervention assessment was emotional clarity, from the emotional intelligence questionnaire. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Table 1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Descriptive characteristics of the total sample segmented by sex from the gamification project based on <\/em>Black Mirror<\/p>\n\n\n\n

See Table<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Figure 2presents the changes in the dimensions of critical thinking and in overall critical thinking after participating in the Black Mirror<\/em>-based gamification activity. Student\u2019s t<\/em>-test analysis for related samples showed meaningful improvements in all dimensions of critical thinking after the intervention, as well as in overall critical thinking (all p <\/em><.001). The largest effect size was found for the recognition of assumptions dimension, with students reporting an initial score of 26.7 \u00b1 2.0 which increased to 32.1 \u00b1 3.6 (t<\/em> = 12.6; p<\/em> < .001; d <\/em>= 2.5), and for overall critical thinking, with students reporting an initial score of 73.3\u00b14.82 which increased to 86.4 \u00b1 6.4 (t <\/em>= 11.8; p<\/em> < .001; d <\/em>= 2.3). A large effect size was also observed for the evaluation of arguments dimension (pre-score = 13.8 \u00b1 2.4, post-score = 18.0 \u00b1 2.2; t <\/em>= 7.6; p<\/em> < .001; d <\/em>= 1.5), and for interpretation (pre-score = 12.4 \u00b1 1.6, post-score = 14.6 \u00b1 1.8; t <\/em>= 4.4; p<\/em> < .001; d <\/em>= 0.9). In terms of descriptive statistics, 100% of the students improved their pre- post-intervention scores in the recognition of assumptions dimension and in overall critical thinking, 92.3% (24 out of 26) improved their scores for the evaluation of arguments dimension, as did 70% (18 out of 26) in the interpretation dimension. The item-by-item analysis (Supplementary Figure 2) revealed that, within the recognition of assumptions dimension, the items showing the greatest post-intervention improvement were item 17 (\u201cSometimes I think about my own thoughts and question them\u201d) and item 15 (\u201cI try to maintain an overall attitude of critical thinking\u201d) with a difference of 1.5 points. These findings suggest that the gamification project based on Black Mirror<\/em> encouraged the students to adopt a more reflective attitude and to question their own ideas and beliefs, which is a key aspect of self-reflection. In the evaluation of arguments dimension, item 1 (\u201cI question the veracity of opinions that many people accept as true\u201d) and item 5 (\u201cBeing objective is \u2018cold\u2019; it is better to let your feelings guide you\u201d) showed the greatest improvement (1 point), indicating an increasing tendency among participants to think skeptically and analytically about the information they receive, as well as to prioritize critical reasoning over emotions when making judgments. Finally, in the interpretation dimension, item 3 (\u201cI try to find the truth rather than be right\u201d) showed the greatest change (1 point), indicating that participants shifted toward prioritizing rigorous analysis and openness to new evidence rather than reaffirming their prior opinions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/
Pre- and post-intervention differences in the dimensions of critical thinking and overall score <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Note.<\/em>The gray dots represent the individual scores pre- and post-intervention for the dimensions of critical thinking and the overall score. The box indicates the interquartile range, the bold horizontal line represents the median, and the vertical lines (whiskers) represent the minimum and maximum values. The statistical analysis was conducted using Student\u2019s t<\/em>-test for related samples. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/
Pre-post comparison of mean score per critical thinking questionnaire item, grouped by dimension <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Note.<\/em>The y axis shows the mean score on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The items with reversed score were recoded to maintain interpretative coherence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The projectalso had a significant effect on the students\u2019 reported resilience levels, which increased from 23.6 \u00b1 3.9 before the intervention to 30.5 \u00b1 2.6 after the experience (Figure 3; t <\/em>= 9.6, p<\/em> < .001, d <\/em>= 1.9). Specifically, 96.2% of the students (25 out of 26) improved their initial scores.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/
Differences in resilience between pre- and post-<\/em>Black Mirror intervention <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Note.<\/em>The gray dots represent the individual scores for resilience pre- and post-intervention. The box indicates the interquartile range, the bold horizontal line represents the median, and the vertical lines (whiskers) represent the minimum and maximum values. The statistical analysis was conducted using Student\u2019s t<\/em>-test for related samples.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In terms of emotional intelligence, the McNemar-Bowker test was used to analyze changes in the distribution of the students\u2019 responses across categories (low, adequate, and excessive\/excellent) for each dimension. As shown in Figure 4, the Black Mirror<\/em>-inspired educational activity had a significant effect on the attention to feelings dimension (McNemar-Bowker \u03c7\u00b2 = 13.0, p <\/em>= .005). Specifically, more than half of the students (54%) improved from reporting either low or excessive attention to feelings before the intervention to reporting adequate attention after participation. No significant changes were found across response categories in the clarity and emotional regulation dimensions (both p<\/em> > .050).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/
Differences between pre- and post-<\/em>Black Mirror intervention among categories of the dimensions of emotional intelligence<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Note.<\/em>The data are expressed as frequencies (number of cases) and percentages (within each category). We used the McNemar-Bowker test to determine significant changes between response categories that occurred when comparing the pre- and post-intervention evaluations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Discussion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The results of this study show the significant and positive impact of the Black Mirror<\/em>-inspired gamification project on critical thinking, resilience, and attention to feelings, all of which are essential\u00a0 competencies in early teacher training and are transferable to their future teaching practice. These findings are consistent with previous research highlighting the value of active methodologies and gamification as high-impact strategies for promoting meaningful changes in behavior and learning (P\u00e9rez-L\u00f3pez et al., 2024<\/a>; Navarro-Mateos y P\u00e9rez-L\u00f3pez, 2024<\/a>). These results further underscore the enormous potential of such approaches in higher education. A good example of this is an intervention conducted with young adults that reported significant improvements in the group participating in a gamification activity, specifically in interest, inspiration, and engagement, compared with a control group (Kelders et al., 2018<\/a>). Another example is the study conducted by Navarro-Mateos et al. (2024)<\/a>, in which a Star Wars<\/em>-inspired gamification intervention improved emotional intelligence, personal initiative, entrepreneurial attitude, and resilience among college students. Although it is important for the narrative to be meaningful to students, technology is another element that may enhance the effectiveness of programs aimed at improving health outcomes. Cobb y Poirier (2014)<\/a> reported similar findings in their intervention, concluding that technology helped strengthen participants\u2019 connection to and commitment to the project, thereby positively influencing their psychological well-being.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the most notable findings of this study was the significant improvement observed across all dimensions of critical thinking after the intervention, as well as in overall critical thinking. The effect size observed for these dimensions suggest not only statistically significant improvements, but also substantial changes in the way students process information and critically examine their own beliefs. Improvements in items such as \u201cI think about my own thoughts and question them\u201d reinforce the hypothesis that the intervention benefits not only cognitive skills, but also critical thinking and reflective capacity, both of which are typically difficult to develop though traditional teaching practices (Bietenbeck, 2014<\/a>). These attitudinal changes may be associated with greater intrinsic motivation and stronger commitment to learning, which are particularly important for training future teachers (Eales-Reynolds et al., 2013<\/a>). The development of self-reflection and skepticism is essential in a higher education context characterized by large volumes of information and the need to critically evaluate and filter it (Mart\u00ednez-Mares & Risco-L\u00e1zaro, 2023<\/a>). Previous research with college students in Spain has shown that individuals with a stronger disposition toward critical thinking also tend to be more receptive to diversity and challenges and to have a stronger creative self-concept, which positively contributes to their self-confidence (\u00c1lvarez-Huerta et al., 2022<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Regarding the resilience variable, the results also showed a notable increase in students\u2019 ability to cope with adverse situations post-intervention. This change was observed in 96% of participants and may be explained by the chosen narrative, which exposes the students to complex situations and creates the need to work on their emotional regulation and develop adaptive strategies. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have associated resilience with improvements in academic performance and student engagement (Romano et al., 2021<\/a>). In higher education specifically, various interventions have shown than an appropriate approach can enhance student resilience and psychological well-being, thereby reducing stress and anxiety levels (You, 2016<\/a>; van Breda, 2018<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In terms of emotional intelligence, within the attention to feelings dimension, 54% of students adjusted their levels to a more appropriate level of attention to feelings after participating in the intervention. This suggests that the intervention may have fostered greater emotional awareness; however, a longer intervention would be needed to produce significant changes in other dimensions of emotional intelligence, such as clarity or regulation (Paraguay-Delgado & Teves-Quispe, 2024<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Based on these results, the importance of emotional education in teacher training should be emphasized, as it contributes to improving teaching quality and fostering healthier and more empathetic learning environments (Paraguay-Delgado & Teves-Quispe, 2024<\/a>). Therefore, higher education institutions should develop strategies that expose students to diversity and challenges within a safe environment, with the aim of training active and responsible professionals (\u00c1lvarez-Huerta et al., 2022<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusions<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The gamification project inspired by the television series Black Mirror<\/em> and implemented in a Master\u2019s in Education program had a significant and positive impact on the development of key competencies in teacher training, such as critical thinking, resilience, and attention to feelings. The results show improvements across all dimensions of critical thinking, indicating enhanced reflective skills relevant to teaching practice. Likewise, the observed increase in resilience suggests that immersive and emotionally challenging learning experiences, when contextualized within narratives that are meaningful to students, may foster the development of resilience. Regarding emotional intelligence, although significant changes were observed only in the attention to feelings dimension, these findings point to the emerging development of emotional awareness, which could be further enhanced through a longer implementation period. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, the results of this intervention support the impact of gamification, when integrated with fiction and technology, on students\u2019 holistic learning. These findings reinforce the need to strengthen higher education through projects that promote the development of social and emotional skills as well as critical thinking, fostering more resilient educational environments and learning that can be transferred to real-life contexts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Abstract This study analyzes the effects of a gamification project inspired by the television series Black Mirror to evaluate critical thinking, resilience, and social and emotional skills in students enrolled in a Master\u2019s in Education program (concentration in physical education). The idea arose from the need to address emotional and educational challenges during the college […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_editorskit_title_hidden":false,"_editorskit_reading_time":0,"_editorskit_is_block_options_detached":false,"_editorskit_block_options_position":"{}","inline_featured_image":false,"advgb_blocks_editor_width":"","advgb_blocks_columns_visual_guide":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[47,47,11],"tags":[14680,8018,156,9920,9920,9920,706],"author_meta":{"display_name":"finderwilber","author_link":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/author\/finderwilber\/"},"featured_img":null,"coauthors":[],"tax_additional":{"categories":{"linked":["Physical Education<\/a>","Physical Education<\/a>","Uncategorized<\/a>"],"unlinked":["Physical Education<\/span>","Physical Education<\/span>","Uncategorized<\/span>"]},"tags":{"linked":["critical thinking<\/a>","gamification<\/a>","higher education<\/a>","inteligencia emocional<\/a>","inteligencia emocional<\/a>","inteligencia emocional<\/a>","resilience<\/a>"],"unlinked":["critical thinking<\/span>","gamification<\/span>","higher education<\/span>","inteligencia emocional<\/span>","inteligencia emocional<\/span>","inteligencia emocional<\/span>","resilience<\/span>"]}},"comment_count":"0","relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 3 months ago","modified":"Updated 8 hours ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on 1 April 2026","modified":"Updated on 8 July 2026"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on 1 April 2026 10:21","modified":"Updated on 8 July 2026 10:01"},"featured_img_caption":"","series_order":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71855\/"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post\/"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2\/"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments\/?post=71855"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71855\/revisions\/"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72992,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71855\/revisions\/72992\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/?parent=71855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/?post=71855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags\/?post=71855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}