{"id":68794,"date":"2025-06-30T15:50:01","date_gmt":"2025-06-30T15:50:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/?p=68794"},"modified":"2025-10-04T08:47:26","modified_gmt":"2025-10-04T08:47:26","slug":"active-methodologies-and-gender-equality-in-physical-education-a-systematic-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/active-methodologies-and-gender-equality-in-physical-education-a-systematic-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Active Methodologies and Gender Equality in Physical Education: A Systematic Review"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Abstract<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Various studies have discussed the existence of gender inequality in physical education (PE) classes, pointing to lower motivation and participation among female students. It is essential to reflect on teaching practice to achieve a more equitable education free from gender stereotypes. Our objective was to perform a systematic review analyzing the influence of pedagogical models on gender equality in PE sessions in elementary and high school education, as well as to describe and analyze these interventions. For this purpose, a systematic review was conducted, based on the PRISMA method, using the databases Web of Science, Scopus, SportDiscus, and Eric, analyzing the scientific literature between 2000 and 2024 relating pedagogical models in PE with gender equality. A total of 521 articles were found, of which 16 studies were included after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings indicated that active methodologies had a positive impact on the promotion of gender equality in physical education classes, with female students\u2019 motivation, participation, and commitment on a par with that of their male peers. The main conclusion of the research found that models such as Cooperative Learning, Teaching Games for Understanding, and certain hybrid models promoted a more equitable scenario, enhancing female students\u2019 satisfaction and involvement and positively modifying perception of them among their peers.<\/p>\n\n\n

Keywords:<\/strong> gender education<\/span>, gender equality<\/span>, pedagogical models<\/span>, physical education<\/span><\/p> <\/div> \n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Gender Equality in Physical Education<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Physical education (PE) represents a positive setting for addressing social needs (Baena-Morales et al., 2023<\/a>) and integrating both social and personal aspects (Fern\u00e1ndez-Rio, 2015<\/a>; Manzano et al., 2020a<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In that regard, innovative trends in PE transcend solely motor-related content and aim to consolidate interdisciplinary learning and more comprehensive education for students based on perspectives such as neuroscience (Pellicer et al., 2015<\/a>), new technologies (Garc\u00eda et al., 2020<\/a>), or active methodologies (Bl\u00e1zquez, 2017<\/a>; Le\u00f3n-D\u00edaz et al., 2023<\/a>). Furthermore, some of those innovations are based on simultaneous use of multiple perspectives to obtain better results and enhance the specific benefits of method, as is the case with hybrid pedagogical models (Guijarro et al., 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the other hand, within the scope of its 2030 Agenda, the United Nations (UN) has defined 16 goals related to achieving a fairer and more sustainable world. Those include Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 \u201cAchieve gender equality and empower all women and girls\u201d (UN, 2015<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Multiple studies have discussed the unequal participation, interest, and motivation among female students in PE due to traditional teaching methods that reinforce stereotypes or emphasize physical qualities associated with the male sex (Arenas et al., 2022<\/a>; Fern\u00e1ndez-Garc\u00eda et al., 2007<\/a>; Llanos-Mu\u00f1oz et al., 2022<\/a>). On that topic, Bl\u00e1ndez-\u00c1ngel et al. (2007)<\/a> offer a particularly illustrative example regarding stereotypes in physical activity and sports. They demonstrated how instrumental traits and activities related to strength, risk, endurance, or a higher level of\u00a0 aggression continue to be associated with the male sex, while affective and expressive traits and activities involving rhythm, expression, or flexibility continue to be associated with the female sex. The study also concluded that female students encounter significant obstacles to access the world of physical activity\u2014traditionally associated with the male sex\u2014and that both male and female students who manage to overcome stereotypes and access activities classified as of \u201cthe opposite sex\u201d are subject to sexist comments (Bl\u00e1ndez-\u00c1ngel et al., 2007<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In light of these issues, the Gu\u00eda para una educaci\u00f3n f\u00edsica no sexista [Guide to Non-Sexist Physical Education] <\/em>(V\u00e1zquez & \u00c1lvarez, 1996<\/a>) and works by Fern\u00e1ndez-Garc\u00eda et al. (2007)<\/a>, and S\u00e1nchez-Hern\u00e1ndez et al. (2022)<\/a> later on, had already identified the need to broach PE classes through a co-ed approach that eliminates the universal masculine archetype, corrects sexist stereotypes, and develops all qualities regardless of sex or gender (Fern\u00e1ndez-Garc\u00eda et al., 2007<\/a>; S\u00e1nchez-Hern\u00e1ndez et al., 2022<\/a>; V\u00e1zquez & \u00c1lvarez, 1996<\/a>). In that sense, certain aspects such as teacher training, language, and teachers\u2019 own beliefs and expectations of their students can impact whether PE is practiced with gender equality in mind or whether it perpetuates sexist stereotypes (V\u00e1zquez & \u00c1lvarez, 1996<\/a>). Thus, it seems that some progress, albeit slow, has been made in overcoming certain stereotypes and beliefs regarding PE and gender, and there are coexisting realities that negatively affect both men and women (Alvari\u00f1as-Villaverde & Pazos-Gonz\u00e1lez, 2018<\/a>). Along those lines, PE teachers\u2019 involvement is a deciding factor in reducing and eliminating gender stereotypes, as is the participation and engagement of female students in PE classes and the incorporation of physical activity into their everyday lives (Reyes et al., 2024<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To connect SDG 5 with PE, given the psychosocial possibilities (Baena-Morales et al., 2023<\/a>; Fern\u00e1ndez-Rio, 2015<\/a>; Manzano et al., 2020a<\/a>) and innovative approaches of the latter (Bl\u00e1zquez, 2017<\/a>; Le\u00f3n-D\u00edaz et al., 2023<\/a>; Pellicer et al., 2015<\/a>), critical reflection is essential to achieving gender equality in education and eliminating stereotypes related to physical activity and sports (Arenas et al., 2022<\/a>; Fern\u00e1ndez-Garc\u00eda et al., 2007<\/a>; Martos-Garc\u00eda et al., 2020<\/a>; S\u00e1nchez-Hern\u00e1ndez et al., 2022<\/a>; V\u00e1zquez & \u00c1lvarez, 1996<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PE Teaching Methods and Models and Their Relation to Gender Equality<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The methodologies used in PE classes, with their pedagogical complexity, play a crucial role in the teaching-learning process (Fern\u00e1ndez-Rio et al., 2021<\/a>). Active methods, models (Fern\u00e1ndez-Rio et al., 2021<\/a>), and\/or methodologies that are student-centered and whose curricula are adapted to students\u2019 needs, abilities, and interests promote competency-based learning that fosters student autonomy and agency (Pa\u00f1os, 2017<\/a>; P\u00e9rez-Pueyo, 2015<\/a>; P\u00e9rez-Pueyo, 2010<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Likewise, different methods can impact student involvement considering that teacher engagement varies according to whether traditional or more participatory methods are used, with the focus mainly placed on students in the latter method (Hortig\u00fcela & Hernando, 2017<\/a>, M\u00e9ndez-Gim\u00e9nez et al., 2012<\/a>; P\u00e9rez-Pueyo et al., 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Multiple studies have shown how certain models, such as the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) Model, foster gender equality. Gonz\u00e1lez-Espinosa et al. (2019)<\/a> found that using this model in elementary school improved the performance of female students, compared to direct instruction. Ca\u00f1abate et al. (2023)<\/a> also showed that cooperative methodologies encourage equality, as opposed to competitive methods that tend to produce gender inequality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Along those lines, Llanos et al. (2022)<\/a> and Aparicio et al. (2024)<\/a> pointed to improved motivation and reduced gender inequality when using the Sport Education Model and hybrid methodologies in high school settings. These results agree with other studies that address the need to tackle gender stereotypes in sports and physical activity (Amado et al., 2017<\/a>; Gutierrez & Garc\u00eda-L\u00f3pez, 2012<\/a>; Manzano-S\u00e1nchez et al., 2020b<\/a>; Oliveros & Fern\u00e1ndez-R\u00edo, 2022<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, the objectives of this study were as follows: 1) perform a systematic review to analyze the impact of pedagogical models on gender equality in PE classes in elementary and high school, 2) describe and analyze those interventions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Method<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Via a systematic review, this research analyzed studies on the impact of gender perspective-based teaching methodologies in PE classes using PRISMA (Page et al., 2021<\/a>) and other systematic review guidelines (Moher et al., 2015<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eligibility Criteria<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The inclusion criteria were as follows: a) studies published between 2000 and July 2024; b) full text had to be available; c) systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded; d) written in English, Spanish, or Portuguese; e) experimental or quasi-experimental intervention; f) scientific studies focused on the effects of applying an active methodology or pedagogical model with a gender-based perspective; and g) conducted in elementary or high school students. We also checked the references of the selected articles to ensure our search was thorough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Search Strategy<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021<\/a>). We agreed to use the following search phrase: (pedagogic models OR teaching models OR educational models OR pedagogical models OR active approaches OR active methods OR active methodologies) AND (physical education) AND (primary education OR elementary education OR secondary education OR high school OR middle school) AND (intervention OR experimental OR quasi-experimental OR randomized controlled trial OR RCT OR controlled trial) AND (gender OR sex). We searched for articles across four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, SportDiscus, and Eric) from 1 June to 10 July 2024. After searching, any duplicate articles were removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Study Selection and Data Processing<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The articles were selected after reviewing their titles and abstracts. We obtained a total of 521 records. We ruled out 505 and selected 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria, focused on active methodologies and their relationship to gender equality in PE (see Figure 1). We also reviewed the references of said articles but identified no additional eligible studies. Two researchers reviewed the manuscripts independently and resolved any discrepancies by consensus. If no consensus could be reached, a third expert person was consulted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Below is a flow chart that visually describes the process used to select the articles included in the review (Figure 1).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/
Flow chart (PRISMA, 2020)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Quality Assessment<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

We evaluated the quality of the 16 selected articles using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria tool (Kmet et al., 2004<\/a>). Two researchers rated each study for design, sample, methodology, analysis, and presentation, obtaining a final quality score.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The quality scores for the articles were expressed as percentages ranging between 0 and 100% and varied from .58 to .91. The raters\u2019 agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, resulting in a score of .853 (p\u00a0<\/em>=\u00a0<\u00a0.001), indicating a \u201cgood\u201d agreement level (Koo & Li, 2016<\/a>). After implementing the raters\u2019 agreement, a conservative cut-point was agreed on for article selection, resulting in the inclusion of studies with scores above 55%. The overall scores ranged between .58 and .85 (first reviewer) and between .61 and .91 (second reviewer).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Data Collection<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The data from the selected articles were collected and verified in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Page et al., 2021<\/a>). Two researchers with expertise in elementary and high school PE, psychosocial factors in education, and systematic reviews, evaluated the coding consistency, and achieved a 94% agreement level in the data extraction (Gonz\u00e1lez-Valero et al., 2019<\/a>) by calculating the number of coincidences multiplied by 100 and divided by the total number of categories defined for each of the studies. This was then multiplied by 100 again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Results<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Study Characteristics<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The study information was coded according to the following units of analysis: (1) Author(s), (2) Context, (3) Methodology\/Study type, (4) Pedagogical model, (5) Variables, (6) Objective, and (7) Primary outcomes. The main characteristics of the analyzed studies are presented in Table 1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

Table 1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Main characteristics of the analyzed research<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

See Table<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

These studies show that pedagogical models in PE influence both male and female students\u2019 participation and motivation, and that of female students specifically. The Tactical Games and Cooperative Learning models help close the gender gap, as shown in the study by Gil-Arias et al. (2021<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Along the same line, S\u00e1nchez-Hern\u00e1ndez et al. (2018)<\/a> pointed out that Cooperative Learning promotes enhanced participation by female students and improves male students\u2019 attitudes towards their female classmates, thus questioning gender relations. Ca\u00f1abate et al. (2023)<\/a> found that this approach promotes gender equality in PE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Burgue\u00f1o et al. (2019)<\/a> reported that Sport Education improves female students\u2019 motivation, while L\u00f3pez-Lemus et al. (2023)<\/a> stated that a hybrid model minimizes gender differences and promotes greater satisfaction and more physical activity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The studies suggest that collaborative and tactical pedagogical models may positively influence inclusive learning and the handling of gender inequality in PE, thus fostering respect, cooperation, and student potential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The analysis shows how pedagogical models like TGfU and Tactical Games may encourage behavior and motivation on a gender basis, thus minimizing inequality through cooperative approaches and promoting gender equality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Discussion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review to analyze the impact of pedagogical models on gender equality in PE classes in elementary and high school and to describe and analyze those interventions. In elementary school, it has been shown that models like Cooperative Learning and TGfU contribute to minimizing gender stereotypes and promoting equal participation, motivation, and performance between male and female students (Ca\u00f1abate et al., 2021<\/a>; Gil-Arias et al., 2021<\/a>; Gutierrez & Garc\u00eda-L\u00f3pez, 2012<\/a>). These methodologies help foster an inclusive environment and promote equal participation and motivation between the genders (Baena-Morales et al., 2023<\/a>; Hortig\u00fcela & Hernando, 2017<\/a>, Le\u00f3n-D\u00edaz et al., 2023<\/a>; M\u00e9ndez-Gim\u00e9nez et al., 2012<\/a>; Pa\u00f1os, 2017;<\/a> P\u00e9rez-Pueyo et al., 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Though awareness of gender stereotypes in high school is increasing, inequalities persist in certain physical activities, as seen in higher engagement by male students compared to female students (Gutierrez & Garc\u00eda-L\u00f3pez, 2012<\/a>; S\u00e1nchez-Hern\u00e1ndez et al., 2018<\/a>). Nevertheless, some studies reported improved motivation and involvement among female students after implementing models such as the Sport Education Model or hybrid models (Aparicio et al., 2024<\/a>; Guijarro et al., 2020<\/a>; Lamoneda et al., 2023<\/a>; L\u00f3pez-Lemus et al., 2023<\/a>; P\u00e9rez-Pueyo et al., 2020<\/a>), which relates to the importance of teachers\u2019 awareness of female students\u2019 participation in PE (Reyes et al., 2024<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the other hand, we observed that gender stereotypes were upheld in some cases, with higher participation by male students than by female students (Gutierrez & Garc\u00eda-L\u00f3pez, 2012<\/a>; Manzano-S\u00e1nchez et al., 2020b<\/a>; Oliveros & Fern\u00e1ndez-R\u00edo, 2022<\/a>), or vice versa (Amado et al., 2017<\/a>), depending on the specific physical activity. In that regard, we found a larger number of studies indicating both the upholding of stereotypes and a lack of impact from the model applied, which promoted male students\u2019 participation by 3 to 1 compared to models that promoted female students\u2019 motivation or interest. This may be related to what Bl\u00e1ndez-\u00c1ngel<\/a> et al. (2007)<\/a> found regarding the two large sets of traits presented and the perception of PE, which portrays the masculine archetype as universal (Arenas et al., 2022<\/a>; Fern\u00e1ndez-Garc\u00eda et al., 2007<\/a>; V\u00e1zquez & \u00c1lvarez, 1996<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pedagogical models such as Cooperative Learning, Sport Education, and TGfU and their hybrids were identified as having a positive impact on gender equality in PE (Gonz\u00e1lez-Espinosa et al., 2019<\/a>; Gil-Arias et al., 2021<\/a>). These approaches helped foster a more inclusive and equal environment, encouraging participation and performance in both male and female students, which is in line with the current literature (Guijarro et al., 2020<\/a>; Hortig\u00fcela & Hernando, 2017<\/a>, Le\u00f3n-D\u00edaz et al., 2023<\/a>; M\u00e9ndez-Gim\u00e9nez et al., 2012<\/a>; P\u00e9rez-Pueyo et al., 2020<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Based on the information presented above, we observed seemingly promising results regarding the impact of pedagogical models in PE to help achieve the SDG 5 \u201cAchieve gender equality and empower all women and girls\u201d and, therefore, help promote a fairer and more sustainable educational environment (UN, 2015<\/a>). Nevertheless, we did identify some limitations in terms of the overall impact of the pedagogical models on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in female students, who presented lower levels of engagement in physical activity, even when a hybrid model was used (Oliveros & Fern\u00e1ndez-Rio, 2022<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite these promising findings, we observed certain limitations such as the lack of detail about the tasks performed and variability in the instruments and ages in the reviewed studies. The need for more in-depth research into specific variables was also apparent. Furthermore, it must be said that the idea to study pedagogical models in PE in relation to gender equality demonstrates the possibilities of these models but does not guarantee any improvement in this regard. The development of prosocial behavior in educational physical activity scenarios is thought to be shaped more by the adults responsible for the class than by the method used (Pelegr\u00edn et al., 2010<\/a>). Fundamental variables in this sense include preparation, attitude, language, or hidden curriculum, as well as other aspects communicated by the teacher (Alvari\u00f1as-Villaverde & Pazos-Gonz\u00e1lez, 2018<\/a>; Reyes et al., 2024<\/a>; S\u00e1nchez-Hern\u00e1ndez et al., 2022<\/a>; V\u00e1zquez & \u00c1lvarez, 1996<\/a>). Future lines of research could focus on the study of a single pedagogical model, or a single variable related to gender equality in PE. Likewise, it could be interesting to address reflection and critical thinking in PE, within the actual pedagogical models, as a transformative practice for gender equality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusions<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

After analyzing the reviewed studies, we can conclude that pedagogical models in PE influence performance and motivation in both male and female students and can also be useful for minimizing gender inequality. Models like Cooperative Learning, TGfU, and hybrid models (which pair these approaches with the Sport Education Model) promote an inclusive and equal environment, allowing male and female students to actively participate and improve their performance. In situations where female students present low participation, both the activities and environment must be adapted to promote gender equality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cooperative and tactical models increase female students\u2019 motivation and satisfaction, but also shift male students\u2019 perceptions of them, helping female students feel more valued and empowered in what is a traditionally male-dominated space. These approaches minimize the gender differences observed in competitive settings. The Sport Education Model and the TGfU Model contribute to reducing demotivation and foster the intent to stay physically active in the long term. Likewise, we must mention that pedagogical models in PE do not guarantee that gender equality will be achieved, as they must be implemented correctly and with a critical eye. In that regard, methodology is one of the keys to increasing gender equality in PE but it does not guarantee it alone. Nor should it be considered the only relevant factor when aiming to achieve greater gender equality in PE environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main practical application of the study involves implementing models based on cooperation and tactical games, as these offer a clear opportunity to improve students\u2019 learning experiences and to foster an environment in which both male and female students can participate equally. This will help contribute to the students\u2019 overall development in terms of physical, cognitive, social, and emotional abilities. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, ongoing teacher training and adapting curricula according to these methodologies are essential to guaranteeing inclusive and effective PE experiences that meet the needs of all students, regardless of gender.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Abstract Various studies have discussed the existence of gender inequality in physical education (PE) classes, pointing to lower motivation and participation among female students. It is essential to reflect on teaching practice to achieve a more equitable education free from gender stereotypes. Our objective was to perform a systematic review analyzing the influence of pedagogical […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_editorskit_title_hidden":false,"_editorskit_reading_time":0,"_editorskit_is_block_options_detached":false,"_editorskit_block_options_position":"{}","inline_featured_image":false,"advgb_blocks_editor_width":"","advgb_blocks_columns_visual_guide":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[47,47,11],"tags":[12928,8626,12383,10423],"author_meta":{"display_name":"finderwilber","author_link":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/author\/finderwilber\/"},"featured_img":null,"coauthors":[],"tax_additional":{"categories":{"linked":["Physical Education<\/a>","Physical Education<\/a>","Uncategorized<\/a>"],"unlinked":["Physical Education<\/span>","Physical Education<\/span>","Uncategorized<\/span>"]},"tags":{"linked":["physical education<\/a>","gender education<\/a>","gender equality<\/a>","pedagogical models<\/a>"],"unlinked":["physical education<\/span>","gender education<\/span>","gender equality<\/span>","pedagogical models<\/span>"]}},"comment_count":"0","relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 10 months ago","modified":"Updated 6 months ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on 30 June 2025","modified":"Updated on 4 October 2025"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on 30 June 2025 15:50","modified":"Updated on 4 October 2025 08:47"},"featured_img_caption":"","series_order":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68794\/"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post\/"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2\/"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments\/?post=68794"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68794\/revisions\/"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":69563,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68794\/revisions\/69563\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/?parent=68794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/?post=68794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revista-apunts.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags\/?post=68794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}